The catering decisions couples regret

A tiered cake on a dressed table in a panelled room set for a reception

Food & Drink

The catering decisions couples regret

Catering regrets are unusually consistent, and almost none of them are about the food being bad. They are about timing, quantity, temperature and the gap between what was chosen at a tasting and what was possible on the day.

What follows are the decisions that produce those regrets, why each one seems sensible when it is taken, and what a caterer would do differently.

The one that costs the most: eating too late

The traditional running order puts the meal a long way after the ceremony, with a drinks reception in between that reliably overruns. By the time the food arrives, the room has been drinking for two or three hours on an empty stomach, and the consequences are predictable: less is eaten, more is drunk, the speeches land on a tired room and the evening peaks early.

The correction is straightforward and it is resisted because it feels unconventional. Shorten the drinks reception, feed people earlier, and put something substantial out during the reception rather than a handful of canapés. Nothing about the day is lost and the whole afternoon works better.

The one nobody sees coming: the numbers changed

Catering is contracted at a number, and final numbers are confirmed weeks out. What surprises people is how little the price falls when guests drop out, because most of the cost is staff and hire that were already booked.

Read the contract for the point at which numbers are locked, and what happens either side of it. A guest list that falls after the lock is paid for in full, and a minimum spend does not reduce at all. Both are entirely normal terms and both are discovered late.

The same applies in the other direction, and it catches people more often. Numbers that rise after the lock are usually accommodated, and frequently at a higher rate than the original contract, because the kitchen is buying and staffing at short notice. A guest list that drifts upwards through the final month is one of the more common ways a catering budget is exceeded quietly.

The one that is nobody’s fault: the room was cold

Food arriving cold is the most common catering complaint at weddings, and it is very rarely a kitchen failure. It is a distance failure, a doorway failure or a staffing failure: the kitchen is further from the room than the plan suggested, the route pinches at one door, or there are not enough hands to move a hundred and twenty plates quickly.

All three are visible in advance and none appears on a quotation. The fix is at the bottom of this page, and it takes a quarter of an hour.

The approach by budget

Tight budget

Regret the courses, not the quality

On a tight budget the common regret is having spread the money thinly across a conventional structure: canapés, three courses, evening food, all present and all slightly under-resourced.

The alternative that people wish they had taken is fewer elements done generously. One excellent main with plenty of bread, wine that did not run out and something hot at ten o’clock is remembered better than a full conventional menu delivered at the edge of what the budget allowed.

The other tight-budget regret is not asking about pricing bands, which is a saving that costs nothing and is invisible to every guest.

Mid budget

Regret the staffing, not the menu

At mid budget, the regret is almost always about service rather than food. Plates arriving cold, forty minutes between the first table and the last, a bar with one person on it during the rush after the ceremony.

Every one of those is a staffing number that was in the quotation and was not read. Ask for server ratios and bar staffing in writing, compare them across quotations, and treat a lower number as a lower specification rather than a better price.

The second mid-budget regret is the tasting menu that did not survive the room, which is the subject of its own page in this hub and worth reading before choosing.

Generous budget

Regret the ambition, not the spend

With a generous budget the regret is elaboration: five courses that stretched the meal past two hours, canapés nobody remembers, a menu designed to impress that guests could not identify.

What people say afterwards they would do again is the opposite: fewer components, larger portions, better wine, more staff. The money is the same and the result is different.

The other generous-budget regret is the open bar with no ceiling, which is the only line in a wedding budget that can be exceeded on the day itself, and the only one that cannot be corrected afterwards.

What actually makes the difference

  1. Feeding people earlier than tradition suggests. It changes how much is eaten, how much is drunk and how the speeches land.
  2. Reading the staffing numbers in the quotation. They predict the experience more reliably than the menu does.
  3. Knowing when numbers lock. After that date, guests who drop out are still paid for in full.
  4. Capping the bar. The only budget line that can run away while the wedding is happening.
  5. Choosing food for the conditions. A tasting is nothing like a wedding, and the menu has to survive the difference.

Common mistakes

Letting the drinks reception overrun

It has no fixed end, photographs take longer than planned, and every extra half hour is drinking on an empty stomach.

Instead: give the reception a stated length, and hand the job of ending it to the coordinator rather than to yourselves.

Assuming leftover food can be taken home

It feels wasteful not to, and food safety rules mean most caterers will not release food that has been out of temperature control.

Instead: ask the policy in advance and order to what will be eaten rather than planning to salvage the rest.

Booking the tasting too late

It is treated as a treat rather than a decision point, so it happens after the menu is effectively fixed.

Instead: taste before the menu is signed off, and ask to try the dishes you are unsure about rather than the ones you already like.

Not eating on the day

The couple are the two people least likely to eat, because they are being talked to throughout the only hour food is available.

Instead: ask the caterer to plate two meals and hold them somewhere quiet, which any good caterer will offer unprompted.

Leaving the timings to be agreed on the day

Caterer, venue and band each have their own assumptions, and nobody discovers the mismatch until the afternoon.

Instead: circulate one written running order to every supplier a fortnight out and ask each to confirm it.

The thing worth doing that almost nobody does

Ask the caterer to walk the service route before the day: kitchen to pass to tables, with the actual furniture in place. It takes fifteen minutes and it catches the problems that cause cold food, which is the single most common catering complaint at weddings.

Doors that do not stay open, a route that crosses the dance floor, a kitchen further from the room than the plan suggested, a pinch point at one doorway. All of them are visible in advance and none of them is visible on a floor plan. A caterer who suggests this walk unprompted is one worth booking.